Back to Blog
Catapult systems7/1/2023 ![]() Jerry Hendrix, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, said Trump’s criticism of the Ford program’s cost and time overruns has merit. The Navy still stands behind the new technology, which is expected to save the service an estimated $4 billion in maintenance costs over the vessel’s 50-year lifetime, according to officials. The system’s first public launch on the Ford in June 2015 was notoriously unsuccessful. The system’s development was plagued with issues, which some attributed to the Ford’s three-year delay. It’s also difficult to control when launching different types of aircraft, such as drones versus a fighter jet.ĮMALS has also had its fair share of problems. Steam catapults can damage or reduce the life of the airframe, take up more space on ships, are harder to maintain and can’t launch as many planes as electrical ones. Developed in the 1950s, the catapults used steam piped from the ship’s turbines to reliably launch planes. Huntington Ingalls and General Atomics referred further questions on EMALS and Trump’s comments to the Navy.ĮMALS will replace the more than 60-year-old steam-powered catapult systems used to launch aircraft. “EMALS is fully functional at this point,” she told The Hill. ![]() Jeff Davis told reporters on Friday that the Defense Department will “maintain close contact with the White House as we develop future budget requests.”Ī Huntington Ingalls spokeswoman said the Ford has been through its builder’s trials at the Newport News shipyard and has been sent to Norfolk, Va., where the ship is awaiting delivering to the Navy. The Navy declined to say whether anyone in the Trump administration had contacted the service regarding EMALS. Kennedy and USS Enterprise - to have steam catapults installed. It is unclear whether Trump wants Huntington Ingalls to rip EMALS out of the Ford and return to the steam system and whether he wants the next two carriers under construction - the USS John F. You going to goddamned steam, the digital costs hundreds of millions of dollars more money and it’s no good.’”ĮMALS, made by defense contractor General Atomics, is already installed on the Ford, the first of three new aircraft carriers made by Huntington Ingalls. I said, ‘What system are you going to be -’ ‘Sir, we’re staying with digital.’ I said, ‘No you’re not. ![]() And I said - and now they want to buy more aircraft carriers. What is digital? And it’s very complicated you have to be Albert Einstein to figure it out. You see that sucker going and steam’s going all over the place, there’s planes thrown in the air.'”īut when told about EMALS being used instead, Trump was skeptical of the technology. ’ I said, ‘You don’t use steam anymore for catapult?’ ‘No sir.’ I said, ‘Ah, how is it working?’ ‘Sir, not good. “So I said ‘what is this?’ ‘Sir, this is our digital catapult system.’ He said ‘well, we’re going to this because we wanted to keep up with modern. ![]() “You know the catapult is quite important,” Trump told Time. Trump’s raised the issue of the catapults when recounting a conversation he had with while touring the Huntington Ingalls Industries’s Newport News, Va., shipyard in early March. Rather than use EMALS, Trump said he told the Navy to return to “goddamned steam” catapult technology to launch aircraft from newly built aircraft carriers, according to an interview he did with Time magazine.īut switching the catapult system would cost the Navy millions of dollars extra on a ship already pegged at $12.9 billion, the most expensive vessel in U.S. Trump, who since December has bashed cost overruns in the Lockheed Martin-made F-35 fighter jet and the Boeing-produced Air Force One, recently turned his attention to the Navy’s Electro-Magnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS). ![]() A digital launch system installed on the new USS Gerald Ford aircraft carrier has become President Trump’s newest defense industry target. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |